Tuesday 18th August 2009 9:36 am

Lesson in Field-Building

More than most emerging fields, Digital Media and Learning tends to draw on broader networks.

image

by Lucy Bernholz

Since the MacArthur Digital Media and Learning initiative first took shape five years ago, we’ve learned several things about building the field of Digital Media and Learning. First, it is not just academic. Having a body of evidence, research-based findings, and cross-disciplinary methods are key to creating the field, but they are not sufficient. The field is inherently practice-based as well as theory driven. Industry experts, youth, and institutional designers are active drivers in building the field.

Second, we can learn from parallel efforts underway in other fields. Specifically, the James Irvine Foundation has just published a paper called The Strong Field Framework.  Its key lessons are similar to the Digital Media and Learning experience as documented in our draft paper, Iterating an Initiative. More so than in other fields, however, we see a bigger role in Digital Media and Learning for networks that cross boundaries as well as feedback loops and rapid iteration.

In addition to these insights, leaders in the field, such as Jim Gee, are identifying how to effectively integrate the assumptions, methods, and data analysis of contributing disciplines into the field of Digital Media and Learning. Gee’s two articles in the new International Journal of Learning and Media, Digital Media and Learning as an Emerging Field, Parts 1 and II, are examples of this.  Gee’s “worked examples” may focus on new literacies and academic methods, but understanding the root assumptions and practices of other partners that is inherent in the worked example model is valuable to all participants.

Category:

Like this post?

  • Email this page using tell-a-friend, or
  • Save it with one of these social bookmarking tools: , or
  • View author profile for Lucy Bernholz.

Comments

kristinwolff
Posted on August 18 2009 11:39 PM

Yes, I like this post! We work at the intersection of economic, workforce and community development - social media is (are?) an increasingly important tool for us. But we face the “media as message” problem. We’re trying to bridge three fields of practice in which the practices themselves are changing the fields. I guess if it were easy everyone would be doing it? Thanks for the words of wisdom Lucy.

Submit Thoughts

We would love to have you add in the discussion. Please submit your content to our editorial review board:

Name (public):

Email (required but private, only used if our editors need to contact you):

Upload your photo (recommended: this helps bridge online/offline worlds)

Affiliation (public):

URL of your website or institution (public):

Comments:
(We will automatically remove html codes.)

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image:


(Warning: You will NOT be warned if our spam filters delete your comment. Cutting and pasting tends to confuse our spam filters, so always keep a copy. If your comment passes the spam test, you will be shown a brief "Thank You" message after hitting the Submit button, otherwise you will be returned to this page with your comment gone and no warning. Only comments that pass the spam test will be emailed to our editors for approval and posting. Contact our editors using the link in the footer if you have a problem.)

Produced by Games for Change. | TOP